in the order of knowing. We cannot love what we do not first know. The Law of Non-Contradiction:
: Sproul rejects the idea that we must "presuppose" the Bible is true to prove it is true, calling this a logical fallacy. Common Ground classical apologetics sproul pdf version
The book defines and defends the model, distinguishing it from Presuppositional Apologetics (associated with Van Til and Frame) and Evidentialism (associated with Warfield). in the order of knowing
Classical apologetics is a method of defending the Christian faith using reason, evidence, and philosophical inquiry. This approach emphasizes the use of rational arguments and empirical evidence to demonstrate the existence and nature of God. Common Ground The book defines and defends the
R.C. Sproul’s classical apologetics offers the church a robust, intellectually serious defense of the faith that honors both reason and revelation. It does not pit faith against reason but sees reason as a gift from God—a tool for clearing the ground of intellectual objections. In an age of relativism and expressive individualism, Sproul’s insistence on the law of noncontradiction, the reality of truth, and the demonstrability of God’s existence is as urgent as ever.
Classical apologetics traces its lineage to Augustine, Anselm, and Thomas Aquinas. It holds that can establish certain truths about God (e.g., existence, omnipotence, eternity) through natural theology, while special revelation (Scripture) provides the fuller knowledge of salvation in Christ.